Thursday, February 27, 2014

Google Fiber Keeps The Pressure On Comcast And AT&T

Google (GOOG) is keeping the pressure on Comcast (CMCSA) and AT&T (T) by identifying 34 new cities in 9 metropolitan areas to expand Google Fiber. Google Fiber offers download speeds up to 1 gigabit and is roughly 100 times faster than normal broadband speeds. Previously, I wrote an article on how Google Fiber's launch in Austin, Texas forced AT&T roll out its new high-speed internet, GigaPower, in an attempt to dissuade customers from jumping over to Google. Now, Google is raising the stakes and looking to expand its market to potentially 34 new cities.
(click to enlarge)
Source: US News
Early on, many analysts saw Google's venture into high-speed internet as nothing more than a marketing gimmick, but this move for a massive expansion in 9 new metropolitan areas shows how serious Google is about becoming a major player and pushing the envelope on high-speed broadband. What's remarkable about Google's strategy is the willingness of cities to work directly with the company and offer a slew of benefits that ordinary companies don't get. For instance, hundreds of cities applied to take part in Google Fiber, and cities must be willing to dedicate resources to speed-up the installation process to make the project cost-effective for Google. This is key to Google's plan to crack into a market already saturated with dominant players like Comcast and AT&T.
AT&T U-verse
As of December 31, 2013, AT&T had 10.7 total U-verse subscribers, which was an increase of 2.7 million subscribers from 2012. Revenues increased from $9.2 billion in 2012 to $12.0 billion in 2013. AT&T is also trying to make a push to increase download speeds and increase its fiber connections. During 2013, the company reached 250,000 new businesses with fiber and saw two-thirds of U-verse customers with download speeds of 45 Mbps. While this is still nowhere close to Google Fiber speeds, AT&T is making it a point to address broadband speeds and fiber connections. AT&T U-verse services account for roughly 10% of AT&T's total revenue.
Comcast
Comcast recently acquired Time Warner Cable (TWC), making it the largest broadband provider in the U.S. Alone, Comcast Cable Communication'srevenue totaled $41.8 billion in 2013, an increase of 5.6% over 2012. Of the $41.8 billion, video, high-speed internet, and voice account for $34.4 billion. Through the acquisition of Time Warner Cable, Comcast will net an additional 8 million subscribers, bringing Comcast's total managed subscribers to approximately 30 million. The acquisition also gives Comcast a new strong presence in New York City, Southern California, Texas, the Carolinas, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Google Fiber's Threat
AT&T U-verse is available in all nine of Google's targeted 9 metropolitan areas, and either Comcast or Time Warner Cable has a presence in all 9 areas. It's clear Google is pressing these companies to be competitive with Google Fiber's 1 gigabit broadband speed. When Google Fiber announced its launch in Austin, Texas, AT&T quickly announced it would offer speeds of up to 1 Gbps by mid-2014. It will be interesting to see how these major players will respond to Google further encroaching on their territory.
Metropolitan Area
Population (thousands)
Raleigh-Durham
1,118
Charlotte
775
Atlanta
4,300
Nashville
609
San Antonio
1,383
Phoenix
1,489
Salt Lake City
189
San Jose
982
Portland
603
Total
11,448
In total, Google Fiber is looking to expand in 9 major markets that have a combined population over 11 million people. AT&T and Comcast won't sit back and watch Google eat up their market share. AT&T has already shown it is ready and willing to compete in select cities with Google. However, additional costs to grow the fiber infrastructure in select cities will eat into profit margins. Otherwise, if it sits back and does nothing, it runs the risk of losing customers and revenue.
Google's Game Plan
It's widely assumed Google is taking on this initiative not to become a dominant player in the high-speed broadband market, but to make companies improve their internet speeds so Google can process data at much higher rates, and in turn, make more money.
Source: Google 4Q2013 Earnings Report
Despite the wide variety of new ventures Google has entered over the last few years, Google search and display advertising remain the company's bread and butter. The Google.com segment accounts for nearly two-thirds of Google's revenue. Forcing the largest broadband providers to increase their internet speed through competition is the easiest way for Google to grow its largest business segment. For Comcast and AT&T, it's a double-edged sword, if they invest in fiber infrastructure in major metropolitan cities, they will drive up revenue for Google's biggest money-maker, and at the same time, drive up their own costs. If they do nothing, they run the serious risk of losing meaningful market share to Google.
Evercore Partners, an independent investment banking firm in San Francisco, predicted Google could build out its network for a cost of $7 billion and reach 8 million homes. Evercore isn't alone in its thinking. A Goldman Sachs analyst estimated Google could reach 830,000 homes at a cost of $1.25 billion a year. Over 9 years, Goldman predicts Google Fiber could reach 7.5 million homes for a cost of $10 billion. Evercore analyst, Ken Sena summed up Google's strategy saying,
"Done selectively, Google Fiber has the potential to deliver a modest standalone return in addition to providing positive benefits to Google's broader business in promoting faster industry speeds and accessibility, migrating more TV viewing and online behavior onto Google's cloud, and paving the way for YouTube, Google Play and other Google experiences to become a bigger part of the TV home viewing experience, even outside of fiber-deployed areas."
Analysis
($ billions)
Market Cap
2013 Revenue
Operating Cash Flow (TTM)
Cash
ROE
Profit Margin
Google
$ 412.2
$ 59.8
$ 18.6
$ 57.3
15.3%
21.6%
Comcast
$ 132.0
$ 64.4
$ 14.1
$ 5.3
12.0%
10.5%
AT&T
$ 167.5
$ 128.7
$ 34.8
$ 3.3
20.1%
14.7%
Source: Yahoo Finance
Clearly, these companies are massive and have the operating cash flow to support large infrastructure build-outs, but what really stands out is Google's cash on hand. Google has over 10 times as much cash as Comcast and nearly 18 times more than AT&T. With analysts estimating $7-$10 billion to reach 7.5-8 million homes by 2022, Google clearly has the cash and strong profit margins to make a very aggressive push in the high-speed broadband market.
AT&T's wireline business segment had an operating income margin of 10.7% in 2013, down from 12.2% in 2012. If AT&T continues to launch GigaPower wherever Google Fiber is launched, it will need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars in fiber infrastructure to compete with Google. AT&T will see declining margins if it pursues this strategy. While total revenues from business customers was down 3.3% in 2013, the company saw 17.4% growth in its next-generation strategic business services, which include VPN, Ethernet, cloud services, and advanced IP services. AT&T sees the writing on the wall. Business customers are already demanding advanced broadband services, and it's just a matter of time before residential customers demand higher bandwidth to stream and download TV shows and movies.
Comcast Cable Communications saw an operating cash flow margin of 41.1% in 2013, which was essentially flat over 2012. Comcast has already seen customers dissatisfied with its limited bandwidth. Just last week, Netflix and Comcast signed an agreement so Comcast customers can stream Netflix without buffering interruptions that have plagued Comcast in the past. When Google Fiber goes head-to-head with Comcast or Time Warner Cable in these select markets, customers may be eager to jump ship since they have already seen problems with Comcast's limited bandwidth in the past. If Comcast decides to take a competitive approach to Google, it too will need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to increase its bandwidth, and in turn, it will eat into its high operating margin. Comcast is already seeing customers starting to switch to its more advanced broadband services. 57% of its video customers enrolled in advanced services and 36% of its internet customers have switched to its high-speed internet. These are the customers Comcast would be worried of losing to a competitor with a superior product, such as Google Fiber.
Conclusion
Google employs some of the brightest minds in the world. Its strategy of forcing broadband providers to expand upon and invest in their broadband network or run the risk of losing customers to Google Fiber is brilliant. While Google Fiber is only currently deployed in select cities, it is clear that Google isn't content to sit back and let the large broadband providers dictate internet speeds to customers. Google has a clear vision that has the potential to pose a serious threat to large established providers like Comcast and AT&T. If Google delivers on its strategy, as analysts predict, Google Fiber has the potential to be nearly as large as AT&T U-verse by 2022 and bring in nearly $10 billion a year in subscriber fees alone. Google will announce which metropolitan areas it will be expanding to by late 2014. Until then, it will be interesting to see if the large providers will improve their infrastructure in those cities, as AT&T did when Google Fiber came to Austin.

Musk’s $5 Billion Tesla Gigafactory May Start Bidding War

Musk’s $5 Billion Tesla Gigafactory May Start Bidding War

Bloomberg 
Tesla Motors Inc. (TSLA)'s plan to build what co-founder Elon Musk bills as the world's largest battery factory could not only shake up the power industry but trigger a bidding war between states eager for the 6,500 jobs the $5 billion investment could create.
The luxury electric-car maker announced yesterday that it's selling at least $1.6 billion of convertible notes to finance the project and exploring locations in Texas, Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico for a 10 million-square-foot facility. Tesla declined to comment on whether any negotiations had begun.
"This would rank as the most attractive industrial project out there," said Dennis Cuneo, president of DC Strategic Advisors LLC and a former Toyota Motor Corp. executive who helped that carmaker select manufacturing sites.
Tesla has dubbed the project the "gigafactory," and it would make Musk a force in both U.S. manufacturing and electric power. The plant he envisions would have more capacity than any other to make lithium-ion batteries.
"This has a huge impact beyond Tesla," said Harley Shaiken , a labor economist at the University of California, Berkeley. "It gives enormous legitimacy to battery production and the future of the electric car because that lies in the battery. It's high stakes, high technology."
Tesla plans an investment of $4 billion to $5 billion by 2020 and will fund about $2 billion of the total, the Palo Alto, California-based company said in a statement. It said the convertible bond offering could grow to $1.84 billion.
Power Player
Musk said in the statement that the plant is key to Tesla becoming a mass-market automaker capable of producing 500,000 or more electric vehicles a year. The company's cheapest model, the Model S, starts at $71,000.
The 42-year-old billionaire could also get closer to achieving his goal of being a player in the power-storage industry in the U.S., as utility customers continue to turn to batteries and solar panels to reduce electricity bills.
The scale of production at the planned factory would be so immense that Tesla estimates it would drive down lithium-ion battery costs by at least 30 percent.
That possibility for batteries capable of storing large amounts of electricity from wind, solar and other renewable sources is what makes the project appealing, said James Albertine, an equity analyst with Stifel Nicolaus & Co., who rates Tesla a hold. Tesla rose 2 percent yesterday in New York to end at a record $253.
"On the vehicle side, I am pretty steadfast in my skepticism at $200 or above. I'm a bear," Albertine said. "My bull case is in the case that the cars become ancillary."
‘Robust Competition'
Tesla, he said, would essentially become a power storage company. That would benefit SolarCity Corp., which is partly owned by Musk and may be a partner in the factory.
Musk said last week that Panasonic Corp. (6752) -- now the biggest supplier of lithium-ion cells used in Tesla's batteries -- may also be involved. Panasonic's participation is "not 100 percent confirmed," he said in a Bloomberg Television interview.
While Tesla identified only four states as potential hosts, "it's going to draw interest from many others," Cuneo said. He predicted a "robust competition" where "incentives are probably going to be a big factor."
A slide-show on the Tesla website includes a rendering of the facility in a desert landscape, with adjacent solar and wind farms to supply electricity. Construction could begin as early as this year, according to the presentation.
"Without question there will be a very intense bidding war -- $5 billion is a breathtaking figure," Shaiken said. States want the jobs and "also the research and development related to this. That's going to be very significant."
Up Sevenfold
Tesla announced the fundraising and plans for the gigafactory after the shares closed at their highest since the company's IPO in June 2010. They've gone up sevenfold in the past year.
The company will offer $800 million of notes due 2019 and $800 million due 2021. The company plans to grant the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase as much as an additional $120 million due 2019, and an additional $120 million, due 2021, bringing the offering to as much as $1.84 billion. The coupon, conversion rate and other terms of the notes haven't been determined, according to the statement.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank AG are jointly managing the offering, the company said.
Previous Surge
Proceeds from the note sale will also be used to produce a "Gen III" vehicle that's cheaper than the Model S sedan. The offering will also accelerate growth of Tesla's business in the U.S. and overseas, as the company prepares to enter China next month.
The fundraising move echoes Tesla's sale of $1.08 billion of new shares and notes in May 2013 amid a previous surge in the company's shares.
"Obviously, they understand the need to strike while the iron is hot," said Alan Baum, an analyst at Baum & Associates in West Bloomfield, Michigan, who tracks alternative-powertrain technologies. "What they are doing is taking advantage of being looked at as a different kind of company."
To contact the reporter on this story: Alan Ohnsman in Los An

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Tegu lizard beginning to overrun parts of Florida

Tegu lizard beginning to overrun parts of Florida

Posted: Feb 26, 2014 11:03 AM ESTUpdated: Feb 26, 2014 12:20 PM EST
HILLSBOROUGH CO., Fla. -- They're big and they're hungry.

Now, the tegu lizard is becoming a problem for Hillsborough County, Florida.

The tegu lizard was first spotted in rural Hillsborough County nine years ago. But since then reports have become more frequent.

The South American invader can grow up to four-and-a-half feet long and lays up to fifty eggs at a time.

Residents have seen them chowing down on local birds and animals and many fear their pets may be on the menu.

Biologists are setting traps in the Balm-Boyette Scrub Preserve to try to determine how big the problem is.

As the weather heats up, the tegus will start coming out of their burrows ready to feed.


Read more: http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/24828422/tegu-lizard-beginning-to-overrun-parts-of-florida#ixzz2uSaw4UJj
Follow us: @fox5newsdc on Twitter | myfoxdc on Facebook

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Turkish Opposition Leader Says More Erdogan Evidence To Come, Urges Prime Minister To "Flee The Country"

As we predicted, the scandal surrounding yesterday's leaked recording of Turkish PM Erdogan urging his son to hide massive amounts of money, is about to get worse. Because not only was the government caught lying, again, after the authenticity of the tape has been confirmed, but now it appears that even more evidence is forthcoming. So much so, that the main opposition leader is urging Erdogan to get on a helicopter and "flee."
The headline soundbites:
  • KILICDAROGLU TO PLAY ERDOGAN TAPE RECORDINGS IN PARLIAMENT
  • HABERTURK, NTV CUT BROADCAST OF OPPOSITION LEADER PLAYING TAPES
  • KILICDAROGLU SAYS AUDIO ENGINEERS CONFIRM AUTHENCITY OF TAPES
  • KILICDAROGLU: WE ARE FACING A PM WHO IS ROBBING HIS NATION
  • KILICDAROGLU SAYS ERDOGAN'S THEFT IS NO LONGER A `STATE SECRET'
  • KILICDAROGLU: LEGITIMACY OF GOVT IS OVER, THIEVE CAN'T BE PM
On Twitter:

The Coming Collapse of the Welfare State


The Coming Collapse of the Welfare State
FacebookShare on Google PlusTwitterHootsuiteLinkedInHootsuiteBufferCustom Sharing Tool
Evernote 
+TAG
BabyBoomersAgedIn 1935, the year that FDR signed the Social Security Act into law, the birth rate was 18.7 per 1,000. In 1940, when the first monthly check was issued, it had gone up to 19.4. By 1954, when Disability had been added, the birth rate at the heart of the Baby Boom stood at 25.3. 
In a nation of 163 million people, 4 million babies were being born each year.
By 1965, when Medicare was plugged in, the birth rate had fallen back to 19.4. For the first time in ten years fewer than 4 million babies had been born in a country of 195 million. Medicare had been added in the same year that saw the single biggest drop in birth rates since the Great Depression.
There could not have been a worse time for Medicare than the end of the Baby Boom.
Today in a nation of 317 million, 4.1 million babies are being born each year for a birth rate of 13.0 per 1,000. 40.7% of those births are to unmarried mothers so that it will be a long time, if ever, before they pay back into the system, and most will never put back in as much as they are taking out.
Liberals and libertarians both act as if the crisis facing us can be fixed if we take more from the “wealthy elderly” or give them less. The crisis is born of demographics. It can’t be fixed by targeting the elderly because they haven’t been the problem in some time.
It’s the same crisis being faced by countries as diverse as Russia and Japan. The difference is that Russia is autocratic and has little concern for its people while Japan shuns immigration and has a political system dominated by the elderly.
The United States however takes in a million immigrants a year. In his 2013 State of the Union address, Barack Obama praised Desiline Victor, a 102-year-old Haitian woman who moved to the United States at the age of 79 and never learned to speak English, but did spend hours waiting in line in Florida to vote for Obama.
Between 1990 and 2010, the number of immigrants over 65 doubled from 2.7 million to 5 million. 25 percent of these senior immigrants were over 80. Elderly immigrants are also much more likely to become citizens, in part because the requirements for them are lower. Many, like Desiline Victor, don’t even have to learn English to be able to stand in line and vote.
15 percent of senior immigrants come from Mexico largely as a result of family unification programs. If amnesty for illegal aliens goes through, before long the country will be on the hook not just for twelve million illegal aliens, but also for their grandparents.
The welfare state has been spending more money with an unsustainable demographic imbalance. There are fewer working families supporting more elderly, immigrants and broken families. The Russians invest money into increasing the native birth rate. Instead we fund Planned Parenthood because liberal economic eugenics dictates that we should extract “full value” from working women as a tax base to subsidize the welfare state while discarding the next generation.
The “modern” system that we have adopted with its low birth rates, high social spending and retirement benefits is at odds with itself. We can have low birth rates, deficit spending or Social Security; but there is no possible way that we can have all three.
And yet we have all three.
In the European model that we have adopted, men and women are supposed to spend their twenties being educated and their thirties having two children. These Johns and Julias will work in some appropriately “modern” field building apps, designing environmentally sustainable cribs for the few children being born or teaching new immigrants to speak enough English to vote. Then they plan to retire on money that doesn’t actually exist because they are still paying off their student loans.
John and Julia began marriage with tens of thousands in debts, only one of them will work full time, while the other balances part time work, and they will do all this while being expected to support social services for new immigrants and a native working class displaced by the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs, not to mention the elderly and the entire bureaucracy that has grown around them. If John and Julia are lucky, they will find work in a technology field that is still growing, or, more likely they will pry their way into the social services bureaucracy which will keep on paying them and cover their benefits until the national bankruptcy finally arrives.
In this post-work and post-poverty economy, those most likely to have children are also least likely to work or to be able to afford to have those children.
Birth rates for women on welfare are three times higher than for those who are not on welfare. Within a single year, the census survey found that unmarried women had twice as high a birth rate as married women. These demographics help perpetuate poverty and feed a welfare death spiral in which more money has to be spent on social services for a less productive tax base.
Children raised on welfare are far more likely to end up on welfare than the children of working families.
Fertility rates fall sharply above the $50,000 income line and with a graduate degree; that has ominous implications in a country whose socio-economic mobility rates continue to fall.
Progressive activists still talk as if we can afford any level of social service expenditures if we raise taxes on the rich, but workers can’t be created by raising taxes. Everything that the left has done, from breaking up the family to driving out manufacturing industries to promoting Third World immigration has made its own social welfare spending completely unsustainable.
By 2031, nearly a century after the Social Security Act, an estimated 75 million baby boomers will have retired. Aside from the demographic disparity in worker ages is a subtler disparity in worker productivity and independence as senior citizens are left chasing social spending dollars that are increasingly going to a younger population. ObamaCare with its Medicare Advantage cuts was a bellwether of the shift in health care spending from seniors to the welfare population.
Increasing welfare is only a form of Death Panel economic triage that doesn’t compensate for the lack of productive workers. It’s easy to model Obamerica as Detroit, a country with a huge indigent welfare population and a small wealthy tax base. The model doesn’t work in Detroit and it’s flailing in New York, California and every city and state where it’s been tried.
After a century of misery, the left still hasn’t learned that there is no substitute for the middle class. It’s not just running out of money, it’s running out of people.
The welfare state has no future. It is only a question of what terms it will implode on and what will happen to the social welfare political infrastructure when it does. The violence in Venezuela and the slow death of Detroit give us insights into the coming collapse of the welfare state.