You wish to know something of that meeting between Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanhayu? The prime minister stared into the eyes of our president…and he saw the truth of the man. He understood fully and completely the corruption of his heart.
“My god…my god…what has become of America?”
Good! Now we know what we are truly dealing with!
And on that meeting – at this time…I SAY NO MORE.
UM: Could the Israelis be intentionally creating a bit of chaos in the Middle East to cause gas prices to rise this summer which would play out against the Obama campaign?
(Long silence)
UM: You got a problem with the question?
WSI: Not often…but sometimes you…such a question indicates this is a political matter for the Jewish nation. Politics? Really? Would you think so little of what Israel now faces? Iran…a people ruled by religious fanatics who openly call for the complete and total destruction of Israel. Is such a…is such a condition politics? No – it is survival. THAT is what the Jewish people face now. Have faced for some time. This president is playing politics yes – Barack Obama and those around him…yes. Playing politics with every man, woman, and child living in Israel. This president worries over gas prices with little regard to the impact those prices have on Americans, but only through the prism of how those prices may hurt his short term political outlook. He has created the dynamic, and yes, some will use it against him – as they should.
But…the Jewish nation is not involved in that game…for them this is no game. This is life or this is death. And that truth appears to be of far less concern to Mr. Obama.
UM: Who are those “some” who will use the gas price issue against Obama?
WSI: Republicans. Business. Wall Street…(pause)…ME.
UM: Did you – did any of you…”trap” Obama on the issue? With Keystone? The use of the environmental lobby?
WSI: You wish for a direct answer?
UM: Yes – that would be a welcome change.
WSI: Yes – we did.
UM: So you are saying Israel isn’t playing politics with the issue in the Middle East – but you are more than willing to play politics with the issue of higher gas prices here in America. That the American consumer will have to suffer because of those politics? Families trying to make ends meet – and you and others are pushing up gas prices for the summer to use against Obama?
WSI: No – I didn’t say that.
UM: Ok then – explain what you meant.
WSI: The subject of domestic energy…it is one that impacts all Americans. It impacts their everyday lives…it impacts the security of the country. Barack Obama…he…since he became president has waged a war on American energy. He and those around him have worked to reform this country’s energy policy into a version…a purely ideological version which examples such as Solyndra are there for all to see. If the media was but impartial to what this administration has done in that regard…I believe…this president would now be facing criminal charges. He has been protected and coddled from the outset, and has grown very comfortable in that environment – where so little accountability is required of him.
Anyone attempting to state this president has not been at war with the more traditional forms of American energy production…look at the evidence! Oil sources shut down. Refining shut down. A pipeline shut down. Billions upon billions given away in the green energy scam…the ties to General Electric…it goes on and on…the scope of corruption is absolutely stunning. And yet – even when information is given to those who could pose a direct challenge against the president…they falter. The use of fear and intimidation…it remains…significant. -Name deleted- knows about that fear. They put on quite a bit of…what’s the term…bluster? A lot of bluster when speaking with you…but they are very afraid.
As well they should be.
UM: You gave information to be used against the president? Recently?
WSI: I did.
UM: And?
WSI: While being told it was appreciated…nothing yet has really come of it. Like our friend…they too are fearful. Though with such things, patience is required…but like you I grow very impatient.
UM: Solyndra?
WSI: Pardon?
UM: Was the information – was it related to Solyndra?
WSI: Not directly…no.
UM: Then what?
WSI: Laundering. California.
UM: What -name deleted- shared? The operative? The California Attorney General?
WSI: Yes – all related. And more…
UM: But so far – nothing? No…no repercussions? Against the president?
WSI: It’s quite a mess. Quite…very murky all of it. But what I shared…it could help to reveal some of it. If there were those who wished to use it.
UM: They won’t use it? Who – if you can’t say who – what kind of authority are we talking about here?
WSI: They haven’t yet used it – I did not say they won’t use it. Please note the distinction. And I am speaking of Congressional authority here.
UM: What is preventing them from doing so?
WSI: I will simply state that Mr. Holder now has MY full attention.
UM: Eric Holder?
WSI: Yes – Attorney General Eric Holder. A very formidable man. Surprisingly so.
UM: Obama’s firewall – that’s what -name deleted- calls him. The stop-gap to everything.
WSI: I would call that…an accurate and deserved title.
UM: So you’re joining the – the battle to remove Eric Holder from his position at the DOJ?
WSI: Yes. I should have done so sooner. But…I and others have determined Mr. Holder has become a far too…difficult and dangerous situation to this country. He needs to be removed from the Department of Justice. Be it by Congress or the ballot box – how would our friend put it? Eric Holder must go.
Just as the fundraising has been made to slow for the Obama campaign – at least from particularly affluent sources…just as there has and will continue a far more formidable media driven challenge against Obama in 2012 than what we saw in 2008…the ongoing friction between the administraiton and the American military…these and other things I promised you would come to pass – I give you that same assurance regarding Eric Holder.
UM: With all due respect – I don’t want promises. I want results.
WSI: I have already given you those – the situation with Eric Holder will be no different.
UM: We’ll see.
WSI: (Smiles) Yes – we will.
UM: Can we go back to what you mentioned about the conflict with the military – the tension between the military and the Obama administration. You told me to look into Task Group 120, right? How that was part of the plan to try and unionize the military. (LINK)
WSI: Yes – and you did a good job of quickly locating that information.
UM: I want to confirm with you here what I uncovered – can you do that for me? Confirm I’m on the right track here?
WSI: Certainly.
UM: So this Task Group 120 – it’s a NATO thing. Has some UN ties as well of course. Came about the same time Obama becomes president. Is that right?
WSI: Yes.
UM: It was – a lot of it had to do with forming a Human Resources policy for these multi-national military operations. Correct?
WSI: Again – yes. You have it.
UM: And the union angle – it was pushed in the Task Group 120 report. I saw that. What I don’t quite get – what I didn’t see clearly connected was the push to unionize the American military from that report. It hinted at it – but it wasn’t right out in front. At least not to me.
WSI: That’s how these things are done. Slowly. Slowly. Then it simply becomes part of the discussion and before you know it – that discussion has turned into the reality. Task Group 120 is very much part of that process. Note how much time is devoted to – I believe the actual term within that report was “disparity in salary and benefits” between various NATO forces. Make no mistake here – Barack Obama is absolutely devoted to the idea of unionizing the American military. And not just that – but having it join with an international union no less. That is among the primary factores being laid out within that Task Group 120 study. And the evidence of that is happening right in front of you – and it seems once again you are missing it.
UM: What?
WSI: Afghanistan. The Koran controversy. It has been manipulated from the outset.
UM: How so? It’s – it’s related to unionization?
WSI: How unfortunate for those American soldiers, yes? To be blamed for such a thing? And then the ones who have been killed during the backlash. The unintended destruction of some copies of a book that had already been damaged by the very individuals now claiming to have been wronged? And Barack Obama and high ranking military giving promises that those responsible will be made accountable? They wish to punish our own military? Make an example of them? If only those soldiers had proper representation to protect them – right? Now think on that. Those soldiers…the American operation in Afghanistan is now a near-fully integrated international operation, correct?
UM: Is it? I wasn’t aware of that.
WSI: It is. And this controversy will provide two things – an excuse to withdraw and justification for setting up a proper system by which soldiers can be protected from unfair blame. The withdrawal scenario will further the idea that America should not involve itself militarily unless it is part of an international force – we are tired of doing it all ourselves, right? That increased involvement as part of an international force requires of course a new set of rules by which the American military is to function. That is Task Group 120. And of course, we must do something about the economic disparity between soldiers of one country vs soldiers of another country – yes? That is Task Group 120. That is unionization.
It’s already begun. Barack Obama – his people, those behind him…those who placed him in power – they are now rolling this agenda out. It is happening now. And even you, who are to be watching all of this – you did not see it. That is how…how well they are engaging all of this. It has been rather impressive.
If they get a second term…if the United States bestows upon Barack Obama four more years – the unionization of our military will likely then be completed. All out of fairness and compassion for the soldiers of course.
UM: The healthcare costs - the increases to the military. That has to be linked to this as well.
WSI: Absolutely. The very people who are initiating that proposal are then creating an environment in which soldiers will be demanding union protection.
Again – impressive how they are going about it all.
UM: Can I ask you about the 2012 race? Your thoughts on the Republican field?
WSI: I am not a political operative…I don’t have much to offer in that regard.
UM: No – I just want to know who you are supporting. You and others like you.
WSI: A specific candidate you mean?
UM: Yes – I assume you’ve picked one?
WSI: I have – some time ago…
______________________
PART THREE COMING SOON
-THE IMF AND FEDERAL RESERVE TWO HEADED MONSTER
-19TH AND G
-HIGH RANKING MILITARY COMMENTS REGARDING “OBAMA RECORDS”
-2012 PRESIDENTIAL RACE
_______________________
No comments:
Post a Comment