At the Democrat National Convention, August 28, 2008, Barack Hussein Obama gave the country a glimpse of the grotesque smugness we would have to endure for the next four years by taking a swipe and sneering at Conservatives, those with traditional American values, and his opponent, John McCain.
“IF YOU DON’T HAVE FRESH IDEAS THEN YOU USE STALE TACTICS TO SCARE VOTERS.
IF YOU DON’T HAVE A RECORD TO RUN ON, THEN YOU PAINT YOUR OPPONENT AS SOMEONE PEOPLE SHOULD RUN FROM.”
Obamacare will cover illegal aliens, which makes about as much sense as rewarding a bank robber with a new debit card.
Now that Mr. Obama has failed as a president in heretofore unimaginable ways, listening to his sleazy campaign tactics today one can only wonder openly if he is a: Hypocrite? Lunatic? Pharisee? Psychotic? Charlatan? Heretic? Puppet? Maniac? Joker, Smoker, and mid-night Toker, or highly trained foreign operative with a past littered with notorious associations, no records, no conscience, and predictably schooled extensively in the art of dissembling. He’s so sociopathically absorbed he’s probably awaiting another call from the Nobel Committee, but this time thinks it should be for Economics.
Talk about a massive disassociation disorder. Obamacare was designed with the specific intent of gutting Medicare, and the pillaging of that source of funds was buried in the 3000 page avalanche of what was called The Affordable Care Act, which in retrospect must have caused him and co-conspirators like doddering Nancy Pelosi and other criminal ilk to giggle uncontrollably every time she steadied herself in front of the camera and said we’d have to read the bill to see what was in it. Well? Now we know what was in it. If serious steps are not taken immediately to eliminate this audacious misappropriation, Medicare will be bankrupt around 2020 or quite possibly sooner. When Paul Ryan argued so persuasively for instituting an alternative system for people under 55, it’s quite possible Mr. Obama did not comprehend it or wished to marginalize Ryan and his position because he was intellectually overmatched, so he’s chosen with malicious reflex to call Ryan’s idea the Republican’s hidden plan for Social Darwinism.
Social Darwinism might better be described by what have been labeled Death Panels, a vital component of the Obamacare wherein seniors will be denied care for maladies routinely covered now by Medicare and ordered to take the Eskimo Walk. His conniving, long-standing, and well-rehearsed defense against this new law, of course, was to instinctively lie and say there are no such things as death panels. It is, instead, defined euphemistically as the “Independent Payment Advisory Board” (IPAB) whose purpose is to “discuss or advise people or families” when sudden or serious illness arises in order to help them understand their “options.” Obamacare, curiously states the specific purpose of the IPAB will be to “keep costs down.” Hmmmm.
Those ailing will be told what options remain for them but make no mistake it is with the intent of rationing medical resources. If you’re a reader of this blog you might be too young to be affected immediately by this surreptitiously devious plot, yet it is a safe bet it will dramatically impact a loved one in your family in less than two years. “No, your Grandma can’t have a new hip, so she’ll just have to settle for a morphine drip.”
Obamacare will cover illegal aliens, which makes about as much sense as rewarding a bank robber with a new debit card. How does one argue with any logic whatsoever that certain transgressions are OK, and in fact bonused while others are punished, then talk about “fairness?” There is no dialectic but there is an explanation that has become all too clear, especially after this president’s unilateral and illegal disembowelment of the landmark welfare reform legislation passed into law in 1998.
Obamacare will cover illegal aliens, which makes about as much sense as rewarding a bank robber with a new debit card. How does one argue with any logic whatsoever that certain transgressions are OK, and in fact bonused while others are punished, then talk about “fairness?” There is no dialectic but there is an explanation that has become all too clear, especially after this president’s unilateral and illegal disembowelment of the landmark welfare reform legislation passed into law in 1998.
The diminishing segment of the population is currently the elderly, which is guaranteed to start shrinking even quicker in a couple years. The burgeoning portion of the population is under 35, legally here, or otherwise. What better than to create in the fastest growing demographic a generational addiction to increased government dependence, by removing the need-to-work portion of the welfare bill, offering free healthcare, and do so at the expense of the elderly who aren’t going to be here much longer whether they die naturally or are given a different type of government assistance to hasten the inevitable, lest we forget in the interim that this entire hustle will result in the biggest tax increase in the history of the world and placed squarely on the backs of tax payers, small business owners, and industry.
Enough good sources have verified that it is the intent of the Obama campaign to “destroy” Mitt Romney, which is not only predictably classless, it demonstrates that the administration must rely on his cheap shot language from 2008 as somehow being a strategy, for all they have remaining is to trot out stale tactics to scare voters because they don’t have any fresh ideas, and, when you don’t have a record to run on you paint the opponent as someone to run from.
I guess that’s understandable when all you’ve got to show for yourself are four years of lip service and lawlessness, doubling of the national debt, high unemployment, a non-existent energy policy, soaring gas prices, industry shackled with draconian regulation, and cover-up of a gun running operation to Mexican drug lords. Moreover, Obama had a compliant Congress that rubber stamped his socialist-based economic agenda, which resulted primarily in stimulus money going to union coffers when it was not being handed away to pie-in-the-sky green energy dreamers who went bankrupt.
Where we were once known as a country of laws we are now known as a land devolving quickly due to a cavalierly subjective acceptance of the very codes of conduct that made it great, and it starts at the top with a man who holds the United States in utter contempt and is enabled by an attorney general and homeland chief that believe themselves omniscient. It is, perhaps, human nature to want to divert attention from a record of such futility and failure, but to do so is not consistent with the moral fabric we have seen in previous occupants of the Oval Office .
The man is not asking for a second term, he’s asking for a second chance. The question is, at what?
Where we were once known as a country of laws we are now known as a land devolving quickly due to a cavalierly subjective acceptance of the very codes of conduct that made it great, and it starts at the top with a man who holds the United States in utter contempt and is enabled by an attorney general and homeland chief that believe themselves omniscient. It is, perhaps, human nature to want to divert attention from a record of such futility and failure, but to do so is not consistent with the moral fabric we have seen in previous occupants of the Oval Office .
The man is not asking for a second term, he’s asking for a second chance. The question is, at what?
No comments:
Post a Comment